September 23, 2026
by: Sherry Aine Te & Chenyan Wang
AIA CLP 2026 cohort site tour group photo. Credit: Enrique Andres Bejarano.
AIA CLP 2026 cohort site tour group photo. Credit: Enrique Andres Bejarano.

New York City’s waterfronts are, simultaneously​, ecological systems, public spaces, development sites, transportation and industrial corridors, and critical infrastructure. ​​In their​ 2026 AIANY Civic Leadership Program development session​, Sherry Aine Te and Chenyan Wang​ explored how the city ​​shaped its ​shoreline toward an ever-changing future, pairing a walking tour of the Hudson River waterfront with a moderated panel on how waterfront projects move from public vision to implementation.

The session grew from a shared interest in how waterfront projects advance beyond ambitious plans toward on-the-ground delivery. As climate adaptation, housing needs, public access, industrial uses, and stewardship compete for the same shoreline, development requires collaboration among agencies, designers, developers, and communities. ​Reflecting on how waterfront development can be turned into lasting public value, three themes anchored the session:​​repair ​and resilience​, ​​community ​and ​​development​, and public​-​private collaboration.​​

The day began with a walking tour along the Hudson River, from Pier 52 and Gansevoort Peninsula​,​ to Pier 40, using the shoreline as a record of shifting industry, infrastructure, ecology, and public life. Historic images were presented and ​set against present-day conditions​,​ ​tracing ​the shift from a once-intensive working waterfront to a landscape of recreation and ecology. At Pier 46, remnants of former pier structures ​​​demonstrated ​how obsolete infrastructure can acquire new ecological value; Pier 45’s history of informal use and ​role in LGBTQIA+​​ community life showed how public space takes on meaning beyond its ​intended ​design; ​​a​t Pier 40, the mix of recreation, maritime activity, parking, and aging infrastructure raised questions about adaptive reuse and stewardship.

Civic Leadership Program, Development Session 3 at the Center for Architecture.

Back at the Center for Architecture​, ​Te​​ led an interactive mapping exercise in which​ participants mark​ed​ the waterfronts they use most and hope to visit, shifting the conversation to how New Yorkers actually encounter and value the ​city’s ​shoreline.

The afternoon panel ​​emphasized ​the multi-​hyphenate ​nature of waterfront development, bringing together four practitioners from the public and private sectors​with backgrounds in architecture, planning, real estate, and government. Panelists shared projects at various ​scales​,​​from the city​-led Bobby Wagner Walkway reconstruction,​underscoring the city’s role in infrastructure repair, presented by Lena Ferguson, AICP, of NYCEDC​,​ to sea-level-rise resilience work in University Heights, the Bronx, and the public impact of ​the ​East Side Coastal Resiliency project​, presented by Laura Frances of ONE. Rutger Huiberts, AIA of MVRDV​,​ ​presented on ​the ​​importance of ​the waterfront​​ to the city’s identity​, using Cleveland’s lakefront development plan’s ​mission to draw residents to its ​downtown​ as an example​. With civic leaders ​navigating more involvement in public discourse​​, the cohort learned from Lorenzo Obias of DCAS ​about ​his career trajectory​​​ and​experience in the private sector and​in ​​city ​government. ​Obias ​also ​​explored ​how​waterfront development stimulates innovation​​​ through​ the affordable housing development in the New Stapleton Waterfront​, which​ will be the largest mass timber campus in New York City​ upon completion​.

Civic Leaders and panel speakers, from left to right: Lorenzo Obias, Rutger Huiberts, Laura France, Lena Ferguson, Sherry Aine Te, Chenyan Wang

The projects and perspectives discussed throughout the day showed how physical outcomes are shaped by capital investment, land-use policy, environmental risk, community priorities, and the responsibility of ​maintain​ing​ public infrastructure over time. A question raised by Wang ​lingered: how do you plan for a shoreline whose plans may take decades to implement, when climate conditions, market cycles, and community needs cannot yet be known​​—​​and which elements of a plan need to be fixed early, ​​and which ​left open? Panelists emphasized frameworks that set clear long-term goals while staying flexible to shifting conditions and funding realities.

As New York continues to reinvest in its shoreline, the challenge ahead is not only expanding access to the waterfront, but determining how its ecological, social, and economic roles can continue to coexist.

Future Engagement: The conversation continues through Dynamic Edges NYC, which brings together session documentation, resources, and the waterfront pamphlet.

BROWSER UPGRADE RECOMMENDED

Our website has detected that you are using a browser that will prevent you from accessing certain features. An upgrade is recommended to experience. Use the links below to upgrade your exisiting browser.